Keeping it "cool" in your congregation

On 17 September 2011, HIPL is hosting a train-the-trainers event called "Cool Congregations". You can learn more at the HIPL CC webpage, including instructions on how to register. The event will be held at Central Union church in Honolulu. This event will kick off a year-long effort by faith communities in Hawaii to reduce the energy use and carbon footprint of congregants. The "biggest losers" so to speak will win local prizes and be eligible to compete in the national Cool Congregations contest.
Although there's nothing groundbreaking about the nuts and bolts of energy conservation, we have adapted national materials to fit the Hawaii context. The program provides resources, support, and encouragement to get people in the habit of conserving energy. More importantly, it reinforces the deep and practical connections between the principles of our faith traditions and our attitudes and behaviors toward climate change and energy use. It's all about inspiration, education, dedication, and implementation!
Don't live on Oahu? Don't worry! The 17 September event just the first of several will hold. We are planning 4 additional training events in the months that follow on several of the neighbor islands. Keep in touch to find out when and where, or contact us to suggest a time and/or place for a training event.

The Moral Degradation of Fossil Fuel Dependency

The trial and recent sentencing of an environmental activist in Salt Lake City who protested the selling of oil and gas leases on public lands illustrates an important but largely overlooked moral dimension of an energy economy based on fossil fuels. In this case, the government prosecuted an environmental activist bid on federal oil and gas leases during an auction in 2008. Tim DeChristopher, known as "Bidder 70", bid on leases with no intention to drill in order to disrupt the auction and bring attention to the Bush administration's fast-tracking of lease auctions during the waning days of his administration.

His creative act of civil disobedience was not unprecedented and thus not unexpected by the government. Regulations related to the 1987 Federal Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Reform Act (FOOLGRA) (Cornell Law) requires holder of energy leases to develop the land for energy development, essentially preventing conservation groups from bidding on and obtaining leases. They also require bidders to have the financial means of paying for the lease. Bidder 70 "won" the auction but was charged, tried, and convicted of interfering with and making false statements at a federal auction (Huffington Post) both for not having the funds to pay for the lease and not intending to actually drill for oil and gas. He was recently sentenced to 2 years in a federal prison, an unprecedented punishment for an act of civil disobedience. DeChristopher maintained that the auctions were illegal attempts to fast-track oil and gas development, and, in fact, he was right: once the Obama administration took office and reviewed the leases, they found them to be illegitimate and dismissed them (MSNBC). However, that had no bearing on DeChristopher's prosecution. The judge also did not allow him make the argument that there are at least 25 other cases of winning bidders who found out they did not have the financial means to pay for the lease and walked away without prosecution (Time).

While DeChristopher had a trial by a jury of his peers, the way in which this act was prosecuted and the very regulations and punishments underlying it reveal a deeper moral degradation that we have institutionalized in an economy that is dependent upon fossil fuels. And that's what is important for people of faith to consider. In my opinion, the intent of the regulations from FOOLGRA that were selectively used to prosecute DeChristopher is to outlaw environmentalists from getting between an addict and his dealer. Civil disobedience is used all the time to disrupt the smooth operations of public and private activities, but violators are never accused of fraud or misrepresentation; indeed, DeChristopher claims he clearly stated his intentions prior to the start of the auction (bidder70.org). Rather, these regulations were used to express the government's increasing frustration, denial, and complicity in a harmful, unsustainable energy system. The response was not to acknowledge the inherent problems and take corrective action but rather to lash out at protestors who would dare to speak truth to power. There are clear parallels with global trade negotiations where meeting sites are more and more cordoned off like security compounds and protestors are removed so far away as to have no visibility for the negotiating representatives.

While these actions are far removed from the atrocities committed by isolated autocratic rulers in the Middle East, they represent the same type of moral degradation. In the case of the Middle East, rulers depend upon largely unjust and immoral political systems; in the US, we are dependent upon a harmful and unjust fossil fuel energy system. When the injustice and harm of these systems is brought to light, a moral (and religiously grounded) response would be to acknowledge the problems, ask for forgiveness, and work for restorative justice grounded in the development of a morally defensible alternative. Continuing to defend and support an unjust system requires governments to deny the problems and increasingly engage in immoral acts to suppress or silence the voices of the harmed and those demanding justice. Climate deniers, as a former post explained, aren't really anti-science; they're mainly in denial about the immorality of a fossil fuel-based energy system. To accept the problems is to affirm the harm they have caused and accept the moral responsibility to take action. The governmental dissonance of prosecuting DeChristopher for bidding on leases that were later declared illegitimate demonstrates the struggle we face in trying to "balance" our desire to protect the environment while continuing to depend upon an unjust energy system. A morally defensible response would be to fundamentally change the laws and regulations so that we move as quickly as possible to a renewable energy system that ensures justice and protection of the environment and human health.

The point, to make a long story short, is that clinging to a harmful and unjust energy system is inherently degrading of our own moral character. The corrupting nature of unjust and harmful systems is clear in the stories of the Hebrew prophets (Old Testament books) when rulers who most benefited lashed out at the prophets who spoke out against the harm and injustice. The call to personal repentance that is so prevalent in modern evangelical religious movements (Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or otherwise) may seem to ignore social or institutional immorality, but the two are intertwined. The fruits of personal salvation should be morally defensible actions and decisions, but such a redeemed life cannot be fully lived while clinging to a morally indefensible support system. That is why prophets have targeted religious and political rulers for their most stinging criticisms: they most benefit from unjust systems, they have the power to change or perpetuate them, and thus their moral character is most connected to their decisions and actions in regard to their defense or transformations. The Bidder 70 case illustrates the morally corrupting and degrading character of our fossil fuel-based energy system and the need for Interfaith Power and Light and its supporters to emphasize this point in their role as prophetic voice for a just and sustainable energy future.

Facts, Theories, and Stories About Climate Change

Al Gore wrote a recent essay for Rolling Stone magazine entitled "Climate of Denial" in which he analyzes the political and social resistance to accepting the theories and models of human-caused climate change. He quotes a philosopher who commented on the rise of propaganda in politics after World War II, that, "The conversion of all questions of truth into questions of power has attacked the very heart of the distinction between true and false." Unfortunately, he was wrong.

There is no "conversion" taking place for climate deniers, rather there is a shift in emphasis from the factual basis of claims of climate change to the personal, social, and political context and implications of climate change. Any honest philosopher will tell you that "truth" is not the same thing as "fact" or "observation". The truth of climate change is not a set of observations, organizing theories, and predictive models. Rather, the truth is an interdependent web of scientific understanding, personal reflection and realization, and values-laden discussion and decision-making in the social and political arenas. That is why the truth, and not the facts or the theory alone, can set us free. Truth in this sense is a story of meaning and value and a call to personal and collective action; in other words, it is a myth in its most positive and meaningful sense.

So why do climate deniers challenge the science, at least the theories and predictions? Because they (sub)consciously realize that to accept the scientific story of climate change is to accept the foundation of the climate crisis as a powerful truth that has fundamental moral and ethical implications, as Al Gore has been prophesying for some time. It is because deep down, they hold the same values and beliefs as those who accept the truth of climate change. And that is a source of profound hope (as well as continuing frustration). Slavery; suppression of women's rights; disregard for the environment; and denying civil rights for people of all races, religions, and creeds continued long after the reality of the "facts" were widely known because many people resisted the myth of injustice and the truths they told. The ones we should really fear are those who accept the facts of climate change but don't see it as a call to action. Their hearts have been hardened against the realities of the climate crisis.

So what are we to do? We should engage with the climate deniers or skeptics on the full truth of the climate crisis. We should highlight the common ground—values, interests, faiths, traditions—that we share in common. The deniers need help coming to grips with the moral of the climate crisis story, not the science. Interfaith Power and Light is uniquely positioned to do this, and books such as Moral Ground provide inspirational essays and stories from multiple perspectives and faiths to help us. We need stories to tell the truth in a way that highlights the centrality of morals and ethics, showing how we all share in the responsibility for what has happened and to respond appropriately.

The Full Cost of Fossil Fuels

A new report from the Center for Health and the Human Environment demonstrates clearly that the low price of fossil fuels hides the true cost of the environmental and social damage they cause. The focus of the report is on coal, but the same analysis can be made for oil, natural gas, or other fossil fuels. The environmental, social, and economics costs are immense, as detailed in a 2009 report by Environment America. This does not include the costs to national security and foreign relations, where America's strategic interests are intimately tied to its fossil fuel dependence.

Economic arguments against a concerted and rapid move toward renewable energy sources essentially fall flat when we take these full costs into consideration. And these arguments are only half of the story: minimizing costs has never been and never should be the sole or overriding consideration for how we use energy. As people of faith, we are keenly aware of the moral and spiritual consequences and motivations of our decisions and behavior, and these considerations should weigh just as heavily as economics on our thinking and action. But as this new report shows, translating these considerations into the realm of economics shows just how expensive fossil fuels really are to our environment, our health, and frankly, to our souls.

Caring for the "least of these"...

The great religions of the world all exhort their followers to care for the sick, poor, vulnerable, orphans, the outcast and marginalized of society. Environmental theology, following in the footsteps of environmental ethics and moral philosophy, has sought to expand this sphere of care to the natural world. Global warming and climate change has created a nexus of harm and catastrophe for the poor and vulnerable in both the human and natural worlds. Indeed, it is showing us in a stark and tragic way that the least among us are often those most connected to and thus affected by the health and vitality of the natural world as well as natural disasters and changing environments. Even in highly urban environments of the world's major cities, the poor and vulnerable are still directly affected by the natural world, including weather patterns and changing climates.

As an example, the recent rise in food prices around the world is being largely attributed to extreme weather causing crop failures and significant yield losses in major food producing regions, including Pakistan, China, and Australia. And it is the poor who spend the largest percentage of their income on food who are feeling the pain of rising food prices as a result. This is only exacerbated by inflation related to the resurgence of economic growth for emerging economies like China, India, and Indonesia.

Thus, for the world's faith communities, taking action to slow and stop global warming is a moral imperative for both social and environmental justice and stewardship. The Right Rev. Gregory H. Rickel, Bishop of Episcopal Diocese of Olympia, Washington recently wrote an op-ed in The Columbian newspaper about how coal-burning power plants defy our covenant with the Creator, using the exhortations of Jesus to care for the least of these as part of his moral argument. This statement is part of the Washington IPL program's efforts to create a coal-free future for Washington state.

These efforts are never simple and may see monumental and quite daunting. But such campaigns are also not just tilting at windmills (if only they WERE windmills!). Having a moral and ethical commitment to energy conservation, energy efficiency, and renewable energy is the foundation for achieving these seemingly outsized and impossible goals. Economics, logistics, inertia, and scary predictions of social collapse may all seem to work against these efforts, but they are no match for the passion, dedication, and hard work of a citizenry motivated to see it become a reality. Hawaii, though small, is providing the nation a workable model for how to achieve such ambitious goals with the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative. We should be proud of our ongoing efforts and, frankly, we need more clergy and faith community leaders speaking out on behalf of the moral imperative to work for a clean and renewable energy future as an essential component of fulfilling our religious duties to the least of these. Hawaii Interfaith Power and Light exhorts you to get your faith community involved in these efforts. Contact us to learn how.

Educating Ourselves About Climate Change

A new report from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication shows that although a majority of Americans believe "global warming" (the phrase specifically used) is real, most don't feel they are well-educated about the causes, the risks, and thus the potential solutions. They also feel global warming education should be emphasized more in schools. Perhaps not unexpected, some of those who deny the reality of climate change harbor misconceptions about the nature or certainty of the scientific evidence of climate change and of the accuracy or nature of the predictions from climate change models.

Americans get their information about global warming from a variety of sources, including the internet and family & friends. However, the internet is the source of choice for getting further information. And when it comes to solutions, most Americans state that we should stop using fossil fuels.

What all this means for the Interfaith Power and Light movement is that objective but effective education should be a primary activity of our organization. This should run the gamut from basic information about the evidence, models, and predictions to the potential solutions at a personal, social, and global level. This report points out that despite a strong general awareness of global warming, there is much to be done to provide people the right kind of information so that the awareness and understanding of the causes and consequences of climate change motivate the action necessary to respond to this crisis.

The reluctance of some of our Hawaii faith communities to speak out on climate change likely stems from this lack of clear understanding rather than a skepticism about the science or predictions. Reaching everyone directly is not likely to happen. We need to provide resources and opportunities for those who have the understanding and motivation to educate others in their local communities rather than serving as a single institutional source for information. The message should be clear, consistent, and ubiquitous in our communications as diverse faith communities so that there is no doubt we have a moral obligation to act and we have the confidence to take action that will be effective.